The Human Induced Climate Change Experiment

Research and Development Incorporating Complex Social-Ecological Feedback Loops Within a Dynamic, Non-Linear System

Tipped Tipping Points and the Domino Effect: Accelerating Climate Collapse

Daniel Brouse1 and Sidd Mukherjee2
1Independent Climate Researcher, Economist, Membrane Institute, USA
2Independent Physicist, Membrane Institute, USA

Abstract

Earth’s climate is a nonlinear, chaotic system composed of interdependent subsystems—atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere. Drawing from chaos theory and nonlinear thermodynamics, this paper examines how feedback loops and tipping points interact to accelerate global warming. Building on prior work establishing the non-linear acceleration hypothesis, we present evidence that the doubling time of climate change impacts has decreased from approximately 100 years to less than 2 years. Data from 2024–2025 confirm record atmospheric CO2 concentrations, fossil fuel emissions, and temperatures, signifying a transition to a phase of self-reinforcing instability. We synthesize recent research showing that cascading climate feedbacks are now driving a compound collapse of planetary systems — from carbon sinks turning into carbon sources to economic, health, and ecological destabilization. These interlinked “tipped tipping points” constitute what we term the Domino Effect — a systemic cascade that threatens global habitability within the century.

Interactive Easy-Read Format

1. Introduction

The Earth functions as a dynamic climate system, governed by the flow and redistribution of thermal energy among its interlinked subsystems: the atmosphere, oceans, and land surface. Global warming arises from the accumulation of thermal energy within this system. The complexity and nonlinearity of these interactions have long been the domain of chaos theory, which illustrates how small perturbations can yield large, unpredictable consequences — an effect popularly described as the “Butterfly Effect”1.

In climate science, General Circulation Models (GCMs) represent these interconnections, incorporating feedback loops between temperature, pressure, humidity, and energy flow. Because these systems are nonlinear and teleconnected, small local perturbations can propagate into large-scale global shifts2. Despite inherent unpredictability, model-based projections have successfully anticipated long-term trends in global temperature and carbon flux — though with recognized uncertainty in rate and magnitude.

2. The Nonlinear Acceleration Hypothesis

In the early 1990s, we proposed the nonlinear acceleration hypothesis — the idea that climate change impacts do not increase linearly, but exponentially, through self-reinforcing feedback loops3. By the early 2000s, multiple independent studies had validated this framework, establishing it as part of the broader consensus in climate dynamics4,5.

Our analysis shows that the doubling time of observable impacts — heat extremes, wildfire frequency, and ice loss — has fallen from approximately 100 years (pre-industrial) to ~10 years by 2000 and to <2 years by 2024. If this exponential trend continues, the cumulative impact could increase sixty-fourfold within a decade, even assuming constant emissions. This acceleration signals a system entering chaotic instability.

3. Record-Breaking 2024: Earth Breaches the 1.5°C Threshold

According to the World Meteorological Organization (2025) and Global Carbon Project (2025), the year 2024 marked an unprecedented convergence of climate records6,7. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations reached 422.7 ppm, the highest in 3 million years, with a record annual increase of 3.75 ppm. Monthly values peaked at 426.91 ppm in June 2024.

Simultaneously, global fossil fuel and cement emissions rose to 37.4 gigatons of CO2, a 0.8% increase from 2023. The rise was driven primarily by coal use in Asia, post-pandemic industrial expansion, and increased liquefied natural gas (LNG) production — particularly from the United States8. Methane leakage from LNG infrastructure, over 80 times more potent than CO2 over 20 years9, has sharply reduced the supposed climate benefit of natural gas.

This record convergence signals a phase transition in the Earth system: as warming accelerates, natural feedbacks that once stabilized climate are now amplifying it.

4. Collapse of Carbon Sinks

For millennia, forests, soils, and oceans absorbed roughly half of anthropogenic CO2 emissions10. By 2024, multiple datasets confirmed that major carbon sinks — notably the Amazon Basin, boreal forests, and Arctic permafrost — have shifted from net absorbers to net emitters11–13.

Ozone pollution, drought, and pests weaken trees’ photosynthetic capacity; wildfires, intensified by heat and aridity, release billions of tons of CO2 annually14. In the Arctic, thawing permafrost releases methane and CO2, sometimes reigniting “zombie fires” through winter15. In the oceans, coral die-offs and reduced vertical mixing from a slowing Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) limit carbon sequestration and nutrient flow16.

This collective degradation represents a systemic feedback reversal — the transformation of natural carbon sinks into carbon sources — driving an escalating and largely self-sustaining cycle of warming.

5. Cascading Feedbacks: The Domino Effect

Climate feedback loops do not act independently; rather, they interact synergistically in what we term the Domino Effect — a cascade of tipped tipping points where each system failure accelerates the next17.

For example, rising heat intensifies wildfires and particulate pollution, which alters atmospheric chemistry and reduces photosynthesis; decreased plant uptake increases CO2 concentrations, driving further heat. Similarly, sea level rise and loss of glacial mass amplify coastal erosion, migration, and economic instability — reinforcing social and political feedbacks that delay mitigation.

This emergent behavior exemplifies a complex adaptive system entering runaway disequilibrium — one that can only be described probabilistically.

6. Human and Economic Implications

The social and economic consequences of accelerating warming are becoming immediate and measurable.

A Scientific Reports study (January 2025) found that in half of 38 global cities, annual heat-related deaths will exceed COVID-19 mortality rates within a decade if warming reaches 3°C18. A Nature Reviews Earth & Environment paper (February 2025) projected that at 2°C, global land area where human thermoregulation becomes impossible will triple19.

Economic analyses by the First Street Foundation (2025) estimate $1.47 trillion in U.S. property devaluation by 2055 due to flooding and extreme weather20. Boston Consulting Group (2025) calculates that failing to limit warming from 3°C to 2°C would cost the world 11–27% of total GDP21.

Beyond these, secondary and indirect feedbacks are emerging: cooling of the upper atmosphere extends orbital debris lifetime22; sleep disorders linked to rising temperatures may triple23; and wildfire-driven PM2.5 exposure could cause 98,000 annual excess deaths in the U.S. by 205024.

Even cultural systems are at risk: by 2050, 14 of 16 FIFA World Cup stadiums will face “unsafe” extreme heat, with two-thirds of grassroots football fields already crossing climate risk thresholds25.

7. Toward a Unified Framework

Our ensemble-based probabilistic climate model integrates socio-economic, ecological, and biogeophysical feedbacks within a nonlinear dynamical system. The results indicate that global temperatures are on course to become unsustainable within this century, far surpassing earlier projections of a 4°C rise over a millennium26.

The transition from a stable Holocene equilibrium to a runaway Anthropocene trajectory is characterized by compounding, interdependent feedbacks across multiple systems — thermal, hydrological, biological, and societal.

8. Conclusion: A Closing Window

The events of 2024–2025 reveal the limits of incremental mitigation. Stabilizing Earth’s climate now demands more than emission reductions — it requires active carbon removal, ecosystem restoration, and an immediate global phase-out of fossil fuels.

As the planet’s natural stabilizers fail, humanity faces a critical juncture: continue deferring action or act decisively to preserve habitability. The evidence is unequivocal — the feedback loops have tipped, the tipping points have cascaded, and the window for prevention is rapidly closing.

* Our probabilistic, ensemble-based climate model — which incorporates complex socio-economic and ecological feedback loops within a dynamic, nonlinear system — projects that global temperatures are becoming unsustainable this century. This far exceeds earlier estimates of a 4°C rise over the next thousand years, highlighting a dramatic acceleration in global warming. We are now entering a phase of compound, cascading collapse, where climate, ecological, and societal systems destabilize through interlinked, self-reinforcing feedback loops.

Tipping points and feedback loops drive the acceleration of climate change. When one tipping point is toppled and triggers others, the cascading collapse is known as the Domino Effect.

References

  1. Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20(2), 130–141.
  2. IPCC. (2023). AR6 Climate Change 2023: The Physical Science Basis.
  3. Brouse, D., & Mukherjee, S. (1999). Nonlinear Acceleration of Climate Change. Membrane Institute Working Paper Series.
  4. Lenton, T. M. et al. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. PNAS, 105(6), 1786–1793.
  5. Steffen, W. et al. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. PNAS, 115(33), 8252–8259.
  6. WMO. (2025). State of the Global Climate 2024.
  7. Friedlingstein, P. et al. (2025). Global Carbon Budget 2025. Earth System Science Data.
  8. IEA. (2025). Global Energy Review 2025.
  9. IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change.
  10. Friedlingstein, P. et al. (2020). Global carbon budget 2020. Earth System Science Data, 12, 3269–3340.
  11. Gatti, L. V. et al. (2021). Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change. Nature, 595, 388–393.
  12. McGuire, A. D. et al. (2023). Permafrost carbon feedbacks. Nature Climate Change, 13, 456–465.
  13. Buitenhuis, E. et al. (2024). Oceanic carbon sink slowdown. Nature Communications, 15(6), 4441.
  14. Bowman, D. M. J. S. et al. (2023). Wildfire trends under climate change. Science, 379(6629), 44–50.
  15. Natali, S. et al. (2023). Arctic carbon emissions from permafrost thaw. Nature Geoscience, 16, 255–262.
  16. Caesar, L. et al. (2021). Weakening AMOC in recent decades. Nature Climate Change, 11, 680–686.
  17. Mukherjee, S., & Brouse, D. (2025). Tipped Tipping Points, Feedback Loops, and the Domino Effect. Membrane Institute Press.
  18. Mora, C. et al. (2025). Heat-related mortality projections. Scientific Reports, 15, 101–112.
  19. Sherwood, S. C. et al. (2025). Limits of human heat tolerance. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 6, 88–96.
  20. First Street Foundation. (2025). Climate Risk and U.S. Property Devaluation.
  21. Boston Consulting Group. (2025). Economic Consequences of Climate Inaction.
  22. Meech, K. et al. (2025). Orbital debris lifetimes in a warming atmosphere. Nature Sustainability, 8(3), 221–230.
  23. Gao, Y. et al. (2025). Rising global temperature and sleep apnea prevalence. Nature Communications, 16, 5543.
  24. Burke, M. et al. (2025). Wildfire PM2.5 and excess mortality in the United States. Nature, 625, 34–41.
  25. Common Goal & Football for Future. (2024). Heat Risk and Football Infrastructure Report.
  26. Brouse, D., & Mukherjee, S. (2025). Ensemble modeling of compound climate collapse. Membrane Institute Climate Series, 3(2), 14–27.

Additional References



The Climate Crisis: Violent Rain | Deadly Humid Heat | Health Collapse | Extreme Weather Events | Insurance | Trees and Deforestation | Soil | Rising Sea Level | Food and Water | Updates


The Philadelphia Spirit Experiment Publishing Company
These graphics, images, text copy, sights or sounds may not be used without our expressed written consent.