Daniel Brouse
March 3, 2026
This is a foundational course in anthropogenic climate change. It is not ideological. It is not partisan. It is based on physics, chemistry, and observational data.
At the end, there will be a short test.
Answer: Humans.
More specifically, the rapid increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases resulting from industrial activity since the mid-19th century.
Primarily through the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas), which releases carbon that has been sequestered underground for hundreds of millions of years.
Additional contributors include:
The key mechanism is simple: increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations alters Earth’s radiative balance.
Yes.
The isotopic signature of atmospheric carbon dioxide provides direct evidence.
Fossil carbon is depleted in ¹³C and contains no measurable ¹⁴C (radiocarbon), because ¹⁴C decays over thousands of years.
Observed atmospheric trends show:
These shifts confirm that the excess CO₂ originates from fossil carbon, not volcanoes, not the ocean, not “natural cycles.”
The molecules carry their own fingerprint.
Through radiative forcing.
Radiative forcing (ΔF) quantifies the change in Earth’s energy balance caused by greenhouse gases:ΔF=5.35ln(C0C)[W/m² for CO₂]
Where:
This logarithmic relationship is experimentally validated and embedded in every modern climate model.
Temperature response follows:ΔT=λΔF
Where λ is the climate sensitivity parameter.
This is not conjecture. It is radiative transfer physics.
Evidence suggests nonlinear acceleration in multiple coupled subsystems.
When growth processes are governed by feedbacks, the doubling time is:Td(t)=k(t)ln(2)
Where:
If feedback amplification increases k(t), doubling times shrink.
When doubling times compress, impacts compound rapidly.
By the early 2000s, multiple independent datasets showed signs of acceleration:
Observed impact doubling times appear to have declined from roughly ~100 years in early industrial phases, to ~10 years by 2010 in several indicators, and to ~2–5 years in certain high-sensitivity systems by the mid-2020s.
Under compressed doubling intervals of ~1.5–2 years, cumulative impacts can increase by a factor of:2 to the 6th = 64
within a decade.
That is not linear change.
That is systemic instability driven by reinforcing feedback loops.
If you encounter someone disputing anthropogenic climate change, you may offer them the formulas in advance.
1. Doubling Time of Climate ImpactsTd(t)=k(t)ln(2)
2. Radiative ForcingΔF=5.35ln(C/C0)[W/m²]
True or false:
1 + 1 = 2
Climate science is not a belief system. It is an applied branch of physics and nonlinear systems analysis.
The equations are public.
The isotopes are measurable.
The energy imbalance is observable.
Understanding them is optional.
Their consequences are not.
RESOURCES:
Advanced course:
Nonlinear Climate Acceleration and the Convergence of Ecofascist and Eugenics Ideologies
The basics:
Climate Change Made Simple: Understanding Feedback Loops and Acceleration
The Nonlinear Acceleration Hypothesis: Easy-Read Format
Chaos Theory Basics (Quick Refresher)